As reported by Robert Tracinski (TIA Daily), here is the reality of Obama's policies. Again, I ask, where in the U.S. Constitution is this power delegated to the President or Congress?
• Taxes and regulations will increase. In the previous era, Obama tells us, "A surplus became an excuse to transfer wealth to the wealthy instead of an opportunity to invest in our future. Regulations were gutted for the sake of a quick profit at the expense of a healthy market." So taxes will go back up on the most productive people in the economy, and they will find new government restrictions placed on their activity.
• The government will take over lending directly. "We are creating a new lending fund that represents the largest effort ever to help provide auto loans, college loans, and small-business loans to the consumers and entrepreneurs who keep this economy running." This implies lending provided directly under the control of government, financed with government money.
• The government will take over lending indirectly. "Our goal is to quicken the day when we restart lending to the American people and American business and end this crisis once and for all. And I intend to hold these banks fully accountable for the assistance they receive, and this time they will have to clearly demonstrate how taxpayer dollars result in more lending for the American taxpayer." This means that federal regulators will be looking over the shoulders of the banks and dictating how much they should lend and to whom.
• The government will vilify and punish bankers. "This time, CEOs won't be able to use taxpayer money to pad their paychecks, or buy fancy drapes, or disappear on a private jet. Those days are over." Having foisted government money onto hundreds of banks across the country, the Treasury will now use that funding as an excuse to impose government controls on the banks—including populist caps on executive pay, which will only serve to drive talented and ambitious individuals to seek more profitable work elsewhere.
• No one can know when all of this intervention is going to end or how much bigger it's going to get. "This plan will require significant resources from the federal government and, yes, probably more than we've already set aside." What that means is that we should expect to see another TARP-style bailout plan, another pork-barrel "stimulus bill," another mortgage bailout. (Already there are plans for another $410 billion in spending increases.) There will be no way for the market to rationally project the value of any investment, because there will be no way to know what massive new intervention the Obama administration is going to launch next.
• Obama will subsidize inefficient and unprofitable "renewable energy" projects. "Thanks to our recovery plan, we will double this nation's supply of renewable energy in the next three years." This means solar panels and windmills, technologies that are only capable of producing electricity at a cost far greater than coal-fired or nuclear power plants.
• Obama will artificially increase the costs of all other forms of energy. "[T]o truly transform our economy, to protect our security, and save our planet from the ravages of climate change, we need to ultimately make clean, renewable energy the profitable kind of energy. So I ask this Congress to send me legislation that places a market-based cap on carbon pollution." The means by which Obama intends to make wind and solar "profitable" is not by making them less expensive; instead, he plans to make all other forms of energy more expensive by imposing government rationing, which is what the part about a "cap" actually means. As for the part about the program being "market-based," all that means, in effect, is that we will be able to buy and sell our government-issued ration cards.
• He will seek socialized medicine. "Let there be no doubt: health care reform cannot wait, it must not wait, and it will not wait another year." Obama doesn't mean "reform"; after all, health care has been "reformed" by government over and over again for 50 years, which is part of how we got where we are. What will finally happen this year, Obama is promising, is government-provided "universal" health care, i.e., socialized medicine. But don't worry, Obama says, because taking over a $1 trillion-plus industry will be "paid for in part by efficiencies in our system that are long overdue," which means new government restrictions on what kind of medical care doctors are allowed to provide.
• He'll soak the rich. After pushing for a trillion dollars in government bailouts and pork-barrel "stimulus," Obama has the nerve to claim that he's trying to reduce the federal government's budget deficit. How? Primarily by raising taxes on the wealthy. "In order to save our children from a future of debt, we will also end the tax breaks for the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans." The wealthiest 2% already pay by far the largest burden of income taxes—and Obama is now expecting them to close a trillion-dollar budget deficit, punishing them for the crime of being more productive. (TIA Daily, 25 Feb 2009)
When FDR attempted a takeover like this, the economy suffered for another 10 years.
Left Coast Capitalist
"Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others."
"One of the methods used by statists to destroy capitalism consists in establishing controls that tie a given industry hand and foot, making it unable to solve its problems, then declaring that freedom has failed and stronger controls are necessary."
Ayn Rand
Rand put it best in her 1973 article, “Censorship: Local and Express”:
“The conservatives see man as a body freely roaming the earth, building sand piles or factories -- with an electronic computer inside his skull, controlled from Washington . The liberals [the Democrats] see man as a soul freewheeling to the farthest reaches of the universe -- but wearing chains from nose to toes when he crosses the street to buy a loaf of bread.”
Further on, she notes:
“…Each camp wants to control the realm it regards as metaphysically important; each grants freedom only to the activities it despises….. ‘Control,‘ to both camps, means the power to rule by physical force. The conservatives want to rule man’s consciousness; the liberals, his body.”
"One of the methods used by statists to destroy capitalism consists in establishing controls that tie a given industry hand and foot, making it unable to solve its problems, then declaring that freedom has failed and stronger controls are necessary."
Ayn Rand
Rand put it best in her 1973 article, “Censorship: Local and Express”:
“The conservatives see man as a body freely roaming the earth, building sand piles or factories -- with an electronic computer inside his skull, controlled from Washington . The liberals [the Democrats] see man as a soul freewheeling to the farthest reaches of the universe -- but wearing chains from nose to toes when he crosses the street to buy a loaf of bread.”
Further on, she notes:
“…Each camp wants to control the realm it regards as metaphysically important; each grants freedom only to the activities it despises….. ‘Control,‘ to both camps, means the power to rule by physical force. The conservatives want to rule man’s consciousness; the liberals, his body.”
Thursday, February 26, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment